Jim Simon photography


Film Photography and some other stuff, you'll see


  • Home
  • My Instagram
  • Contact

back to cameras and films



Fuji GW690II



Oh blimey! What's this? A monster camera. Why why why..? A look below should tell you why. I had the Yashica Mat but, well, it was just plain difficult to use, and "only" gave up 6x6 negatives, and I often found that I was cropping those images into either landscape or portrait images and so much of the medium format acreage was going to waste. I did some looking about and found a series of cameras that I had simply never heard of. I'd heard of Fuji, of course - indeed I had bought a Fuji GS645S camera some time ago - and I knew Fuji were renowned for producing excellent lenses. At the time I began looking, the 6x9 Fujis were not too expensive as they were under everyone else's radar too. I wanted to get into more considered, perhaps even formal, photography. I prefer 35mm for the grainy sense of immediacy, but I could see the clarity and sense of purpose of larger format photographs and wanted to give it a go. Stephen Shore's large format images are tremendous records and, surely, I could look forward to having a bit of that! I mean, 6x9 is HUGE!

I bought my 690II from a seller in Japan, and all seemed well until I got the camera here after paying the dues and so on, only to find it didn't work. It was a lengthy story, but I chose to get it repaired here in the UK and got into a discussion with the seller but, now I come to think of it, I don't think anything actually ever did come back from them. Well, the world's got more on its plate than this so I've let it go.

I did try a bit of black and white in this camera, but I preferred the look of 35mm for black and white, so I bought a roll or two of Portra 400 and was hooked. Now, of course, what with everything going on, I've had a roll in the camera for months on end and it'll probably be there for months more, but we can't help that. I'll get back out there.



Fuji GW690ii | Portra 400

There's a clarity and 3D starkness derived from the size of the negative and the sharpness of the lens.



Fuji GW690ii | Portra 400

Up early.



Fuji GW690ii | Portra 400

You won't see how resolved this image is on the web. I reckon I could blow this up so large that you could see it out of your window and still count every flake of paint. There is a tendency to red with Portra in my scanner, which is a bit of a problem with red garages. But that's what Photoshop's for.



The glory of 6x9



120 film's expensive at the best of times, and with the 6x9 format one gets all of 8 exposures per roll. And if one's thinking of colour that's even more like... a lot... per frame! Indeed it is, but to some extent that's the point. Now, I don't waste film (others may not agree...) even when using 35mm and it costs just a few pence per exposure. In fact I'm as mean as they come; it's just that I'm even more meanerer with Portra 400 in this 6x9 wunderbox. Once my mean chip's been activated I take a lot of care. Firstly - will I use this image? Will it be in my annual book or be otherwise valuable to me? Should I take the shot here, or there, but not both! Shall I wait and come back when the light's just right? Just don't take a casual shot in case it works out. With previous 120 format cameras I found I was forever up against having to use slow shutter speeds, so I bought a tripod but I've never used it; this camera is as stable as they come and I use 1/30th handheld without worrying about it. And I don't take two shots in case!!!​?

Is it worth it? Oh yes. Maybe you have to see it to appreciate it, but I really enjoy the way one can wander through extended landscapes, even if the image isn't blown up to any extreme extent. Does it make me wish that all my photographs could be taken with 6x9 negatives? No - I actually prefer black and white images with 35mm film. I like the impressionistic nature of swirly grain and the rough freshness of accident and chance. I did run a couple of rolls of FP4 through the 6x9 and they were... uninteresting.

I don't like rangefinder focusing in situations where I just want to get on and press the shutter. With my OM's I don't worry about the micro-detail in the central prism - I just go with the general view around the lovely bright focusing screen. With a rangefinder you do have to find that patch, and with my Leica M2, even though the patch is bright, finding it and using the lever and so on is still a block to just taking the photo compared to an SLR with a good viewfinder. This Fuji is a rangefinder, but I'm not using it for spontaneous photography and so, actually, having to find the focus isn't much of an issue when the deployment of the camera is more studied in the first place.

​Here are a few more because I can't stop.



Fuji GW690ii | Portra 400

I don't think I'd have the cheek to turn a digital photograph this colour, but the film takes the blame and that's fine with me.



Fuji GW690ii | Portra 400​



Fuji GW690ii | Portra 400



Fuji GW690ii | Portra 400​



back